FoundConf Mike King.pdf
本地来源:seo-llm/raw/seo知识库/TXT整理/PPT/John喜欢和引用的那些海外演讲嘉宾PPTs/FoundConf-Mike King.pdf.txt
THE AI SEARCH PLAYBOOK IT’S NOT JUST SEO. Michael King Founder and CEO iPullRank Search Engine Land Just Gave Me This Award for the Second Time THE PROLOGUE SOME THOUGHTS BEFORE WE GET STARTED 4 I RECENTLY THREW MY FIRST CONFERENCE Andouille capicola doner picanha, quis flank exercitation pork belly chicken. Jowl biltong porchetta beef incididunt sausage doner t-bone ut mollit andouille. Aliqua magna occaecat quis short ribs beef ullamco. Salami drumstick pork loin ea. https://ipullrank.com 5 YOU KNOW WHO ELSE PERFORMED? ME. This was the moment that I decided I don’t want to have to win over crowds anymore. I want people to already know the music. So, I decided I’m going to make a hit record. AI Search Playbook | …SO I WENT AND WORKED WITH SCOTT STORCH A couple weekends ago, I flew to Miami to work on a song with the guy behind hits from Beyonce, 50 Cent, Justin Timberlake, and many more. SCOTT STORCH HAD HUMBLE BEGINNINGS Scott grew up in Philly too and was an early member of The Roots. AI Search Playbook | SCOTT STORCH SCORED A $100MM FORTUNE The guy used his piano skills to go to the top of the A-list in the aughts. Get it: “scored?” 😏 HE ALSO PRETTY FAMOUSLY LOST IT ALL He had a very well-documented downfall. AI Search Playbook | It was one of the craziest days of my life. I was around a bunch of people who believed they could do anything at anytime…and did. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | Now is the moment to bring all those big ideas to life. There is nothing stopping you from doing the absolute coolest thing you can think of and changing the world around you. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | THE FUTURE OF SEARCH IN BRIEF 16 SINCE 2016, I’VE SAID THE FUTURE OF SEARCH LOOKS LIKE THE MOVIE “HER” At HubSpot’s Inbound Conference I explained that we had all the tech required to make the assistant from “Her” real. Just last year OpenAI rolled out their version of ChatGPT as a voice assistant. Now that they have memory and other integrations, the technology in the movie is effectively real. PRAGMATICALLY, THAT PLAYS OUT LIKE THIS Weʼve all had the experience of 50 open tabs and the shopping cart we forgot we filled. The proactive search experience alerts you when you are passing a store with that product. THE FUTURE OF SEARCH IS AGENTIC THE AGENT COLLECTS INFORMATION FOR THE USER PROACTIVELY NOW NEXT Consumers discover, interpret, and consume information. The agent does more than browsing. It interprets and prepares the information for the user. It delivers a ready-made, cohesive answer. Discover Interpret Consume Discover Interpret Consume PAGE 19 THE GAME HAS CHANGED Google is still the main stage for discovery, but search behavior is fragmenting. AI Search platforms including AI Overviews (and AI Mode), ChatGPT, and Perplexity, are shifting the way people search. Visibility now depends on presence across all search stages. PAGE 20 SEARCH HAS GONE FROM DETERMINISTIC TO PROBABILISTIC Deterministic Search Probabilistic Search What you put into the search engine came out the same on the other side and the results were consistently replicable. Results are augmented through reasoning chains and the output changes based on an array of variables. ANSWERS COME FROM EVERYWHERE Conversational Search stitches passages together from various sources based on invisible subqueries. These AI Search systems donʼt simply rank URLs. They retrieve, blend, and synthesize ideas. The more surfaces you appear on, the greater your chance to be included. You win the raffle by holding more tickets than the competition. PAGE 22 PASSAGES GO THROUGH PROBABILISTIC “REASONING CHAINS” We have no control over what makes it through the reasoning chains. “PERSONAL CONTEXT” IS A FUNCTION OF VECTOR EMBEDDINGS Google is creating embeddings about all of a userʼs interactions to filter out results. Consequently, embeddings are the technology that fuel search. The prediction thereof is what underpins Generative AI. VISIBILITY IS MULTIMODAL Success now requires more than optimized text on your website. Discovery happens through text, video, product data, podcasts, PDFs, and social. Your brand must meet users in every format and on every surface. PAGE 25 RELEVANCE LIVES IN THE OVERLAP Classic SEO relies on crawlability, indexing, and authority. Conversational search depends on context, knowledge quality, and synthesis. Relevance Engineering unites both, giving your brand the machine-level advantage to stay retrieved and recommended. The brands that engineer relevance will define the winners of AI Search. PAGE 26 THE FUTURE OF SEO Search is strategically different from what the industry and software can currently support. Winning means creating content that resonates and building persona-driven, audience-first matrices mapped to the new search journey. Relevance Engineering is the framework that makes sense of this complexity and keeps your brand in the answer set. PAGE 27 USER BEHAVIOR HAS EVOLVED AND SEARCH IS BIGGER THAN GOOGLE WE’LL HAVE LESS CONTROL OVER WHAT THE USER SEES DUE TO HOW USER BIASES Every interaction the user has with the system biases the output in more meaningful ways than we’re used to with search. Brand efforts will have much more of an impact. IN SOME SPACES THERE ARE DIRECT INTEGRATIONS THAT BIAS SEARCH Zillow isn’t just a listing site anymore, it’s becoming the “ask-and-see” portal for home search in the AI era. For consumers, this means simpler, more intuitive access to homes. They’ve created integrations with ChatGPT and Google and that appears to be biasing results in Gemini and AIOs. Those with relationships with ChatGPT will likely benefit. Google is likely to remain less bias here. SEARCH IS BECOMING MORE OF A BRANDING CHANNEL Even if these results donʼt yield a click, your brand is now a part of the userʼs consideration set from this non-branded search. ADDITIONAL SEARCH MODALITIES ARE MATURING Users have gone well beyond their desktop computers and are searching in the real world. The technology has matured and will continue to evolve to the point where the line is blurred between the digital and the physical. THE FUTURE OF SEARCH REDUCES FRICTION BETWEEN THE DIGITAL & PHYSICAL WORLDS W/ A PROACTIVE ASSISTANT THAT UNDERSTANDS YOU Users never wanted 10 blue links. They wanted the Star Trek computer. The Future of Search is a multimodal user experience that is far less about the interface, and users synthesizing a wealth of information. Itʼs far more about the evolution of technology helping users do more of what they want in the real world by developing a long term understanding of individuals and giving them exactly what they want before they ask for it. Brands need to be proactive to keep meeting their users where they are at. SEO IS DEPRECATED IT’S NOT DEAD, BUT IT’S NOT WHAT I DO 34 AI Overviews are Changing User Behavior AI Overviews are Causing Traffic Losses Wikipedia, one of the most Organic Search reliant websites saw its traffic grow with the introduction of ChatGPT, but has seen its traffic decline with the advent of AI Overviews. STUDIES SHOW AIOS REDUCE CTR BY 34.5% A recent study of 300,000 keywords by SEO platform Ahrefs found that click-through rates drop by 34.5% when Google displays an AI Overview. This confirms that the impact of AI-generated answers isn’t limited to a few websites—it’s a systemic shift affecting the entire search landscape. I LOVE TO SAY I TOLD YOU SO I PREDICTED THIS 2 YEARS AGO https://searchengineland. com/how-search-generat ive-experience-works-an d-why-retrieval-augmen ted-generation-is-our-fu ture-433393# — Somebody in Mountain View, Google AI Search Playbook | TRAFFIC AND CONVERSIONS HAVE DIVERGED AIOs Yield Less Traffic, but More Qualified SEO IS HAVING A BLOCKBUSTER MOMENT Back in 2000, Blockbuster executives reportedly laughed Netflix out of the boardroom when offered the chance to buy them for $50 million. Fast-forward to today. Netflix is worth over $200 billion, while Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy in 2010. AI Search Playbook | TRADITIONAL SEARCH IS MELTING DOWN The foundational assumptions that built entire marketing departments are crumbling: Rankings = Revenue — Irrelevant when users never click to your site Content = Quantity * Keywords — Useless when AI systems synthesize information from multiple sources into a single response More pages = More traffic — Meaningless when AI answers questions without sending users anywhere AI Search Playbook | CLICKS ARE DECLINING Sure, Google still holds the lion’s share of overall user activity and search traffic as of Q1 2025, but the landscape beneath our feet is shifting dramatically. Recent industry analysis shows year-over-year growth in clickless queries while clicks to organic results continue declining. LLM TRAFFIC IS MORE VALUABLE Semrush is projecting that the value of the classic Organic Search will continually drop while AI Search channels will gain grown dramatically over the next four years. AI Search Playbook | WE MISSED THE MOMENT. IT’S GEO. While our industry spent the last year in-fighting about what things should be called, the market has named it. It’s called “Generative Engine Optimization.” Let’s move the fuck on. AI Search Playbook | WHAT WE DO AT IPR IS RELEVANCE ENGINEERING (R19G) “SEO” and “GEO” never made sense to me. We were never “optimizing” search engines. We were feature engineering inputs for search engines. Ours is a channel-agnostic approac that is is the confluence of AI, IR, CS, UX, and DPR. SEOS NEED TO EVOLVE Modern search visibility requires engineering relevant content that can easily show up in every type of search platform. This is where GEO comes in. GEO builds on similar value systems that advanced SEOs, content marketers, and digital PR teams already understand, but the execution requires entirely new skill sets, tools, and strategic thinking. AI Search Playbook | INTUITION WON’T CUT IT IN THESE ENVIRONMENTS The days of SEO “best practices” based on educated guesses are coming to an end. When you’re competing for visibility in systems that process billions of data points, intuition isn’t enough. You need statistical rigor. AI Search Playbook | RELEVANCE ENGINEERING IS GROWING BEYOND CHECKLISTS SEO is a “checklist culture” where people mindlessly follow outdated best practices, which is quite wrong. Instead, engineering for relevance requires establishing a series of technical standards rather than relying on anecdotal evidence. NEW ROLES ARE EMERGING The functionality of these new channels has evolved so new skills at the intersection of AI and content strategy (content engineering) and deeper understanding are required to navigate them. YOU NEED TO UPSKILL TO GENAI The adoption numbers tell the story. According to Stanford’s 2025 AI Index Report, 78% of global organizations are now using AI in production; up from 55% in 2023. This surge in adoption is creating massive hiring demand for new skill sets. Generative AI skills in job postings have exploded across every category, with some skills seeing over 2,000% growth year-over-year. Prompt engineering roles increased 350%, while retrieval augmented generation positions jumped over 2,000%. AI Search Playbook | NEW SOFTWARE IS EMERGING If ChatGPT’s Atlas browser catches on, it’s likely going to change the user interaction model of the web even more. We are moving from a Google-shaped web to an agent-shaped web. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook THE STATE OF AI SEARCH TRENDS AND ALL THAT STUFF YOU CAN SHOW YOUR BOSS 53 USERS NEVER WANTED 10 BLUE LINKS A user wants answers, but classic search has high access, cognitive, and time costs that make the process too inefficient. Google’s has gradually shifted to an answer surface rather than a portal to the web. AI Search Playbook | User preferences, and what users want, is also changing. So, instead of factual answers and 10 blue links, they’re increasingly wanting contextual answers and summaries. — Markham Erickson, VP , Google AI Search Playbook | SEARCH JOURNEYS ARE MESSIER THAN EVER While the search journey has never been linear, the user navigates the stages in a stages in an even messier back-and-forth now. OVER 50% OF GOOGLE SEARCHES RESULT IN ZERO CLICKS SOURCE: SPARKTORO / JUMPSHOT As Google has emerged as an answer surface, more than half of users are not clicking through to results the open web. This has continued to accelerate with the advent of AI Overviews. However, users that click through are more likely to be ready to take action. ZERO CLICK SEARCHES TO NEWS SITES ROSE TO 67% YOY Based on data from SimilarWeb new sites went from 56% zero click to 67% YoY. Publishers have been hit the worst by these changes. AI Search Playbook | ONLY 1% OF USERS CLICK LINKS IN AIOS According to a study from the Pew Research Center user behavior swings dramatically when AIOs are present with users clicking out to the open web 47% less and ending their search session 62.5% more. Note: Google has refuted this study. USERS QUERIES ARE EVOLVING SLOWER IN GOOGLE Although AI Mode and ChatGPT are similar in function and users give more robust and freeform prompts to ChatGPT, they are still ramping up prompt length in the Google environment. HIGHER QUALITY CLICKS FROM AI SEARCH Adobe’s recent study has indicated that the gap in the conversion rates between AI and non-AI channels has closed significantly in a very short time frame. …BUT A NEW GERMAN STUDY SAYS OTHERWISE 🚥 <0.2% of traffic vs Google’s organic 📈 Conversion rates rising, but AOV falling 🧭 Great bounce rates ≠ deep engagement Source: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p apers.cfm?abstract_id=5585812 AI Search Playbook | AGENTIC COMMERCE PROTOCOL WILL CHANGE E-COMMERCE OpenAI’s and Stripe rolled out a specification that revolutionizes shopping feeds and allows users to transact directly in generative environments. 52% OF ADULTS USE LLMS A study by Elon University found that 52% of U.S. adults now use LLMs, 34% of whom use them at least once a day, and that number is sure to grow. AI Search Playbook | AIOs HAVE GROWN RAPIDLY Semrush’s analysis of over 10 million keywords found that AI Overviews were triggered for 6.49% of queries in January 2025, climbing to 7.64% in February (an 18% increase), and jumping to 13.14% by March – a 72% increase from the previous month. THE GREAT DECOUPLING More impressions: Your content may be seen more often because it’s being summarized in the Overviews. Fewer clicks: But users may never visit your site because they already got what they needed from the summary. THE BIGGER DEAL IS HOW IT SKEWS THE SOURCE OF TRUTH GOOGLE JUST CHANGED THE DENOMINATOR Like it or not, GSC is the universal source of truth for what is happening in the Google ecosystem. That source of truth effectively just changed the denominator in its calculations and now everyone thinks they have more visibility than they do. GOOGLE IS HIRING SO IT WILL GET WORSE Google has two job openings for Anti-scraping analysts so you can expect that rank tracking is going to get a lot trickier. AI Search Playbook | Protip: How about we stop targeting keywords with 30 MSV when we track them daily in SERP tracking tools. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | REFERRAL TRAFFIC IS LOW FOR THESE CHANNELS From May to July 2025, SimilarWeb data indicate that fewer than 20% of Google search users click a link to an external site, while fewer than 4% do so in AI Mode. This sharp gap in outbound clicks from AI Mode signals the need to completely redefine KPIs for measuring organic search performance. AI Search Playbook | REFERRAL TRAFFIC FROM CHATGPT AND PERPLEXITY HAS GROWN 4X SINCE 2024 Data from SE Ranking shows that AI traffic from ChatGPT and Perplexity has grown to 0.13% globally – four times higher than in 2024. It’s still a rounding error for most websites, but the value of the traffic cannot be ignored. If you’re making decisions based on just traffic, you’re missing the point of the channel. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook GOOGLE IS STILL DOMINANT Google still drive 8X more traffic than ChatGPT and 90% of users that use ChatGPT use Google. Google still drives more referral traffic than any source. AI Search Playbook | Many new platforms will emerge, but Google will be the long term winner. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | GOOGLE’S PROPRIETARY DATA ADVANTAGE One of Google’s biggest advantages is its access to proprietary data at scale. While many companies rely on publicly available content to train their models, Google taps into its enormous, constantly updating stream of data. FIRST-PARTY CHIP DEVELOPMENT (TPUS) GOOGLE DOESN’T NEED NVIDIA While many AI companies rely on third-party chips like NVIDIA (which is suffering from a chip shortage), Google has built its own Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). TPUs are custom-designed chips built by Google to accelerate the kind of math operations that deep learning depends on. BILLION-USER PRODUCTS Google owns multiple products with over a billion active users, giving it an instant audience to test, deploy, and refine AI features at unmatched speed. AI SLOP IS GROWING FAST A Stanford University study analyzing over 300 million documents (from corporate press releases and job postings to UN press releases) showed a sharp surge in LLM-generated content following the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. AI-GENERATED CONTENT IS 16.5% OF GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS According to Originality AI, AI-generated content accounted for 19.10% of Google search results as of January 2025, up from just 7.43% in March 2024. Even as that figure dipped slightly to 16.51% by June, the signal remains clear. AI USAGE DOES NOT IMPACT RANKINGS According to data from Ahrefs, 86.5% of top-ranking pages now include some form of AI assistance. Only 13.5% are fully human-written. Google appears largely indifferent to this shift. That is, it neither significantly rewards nor penalizes AI-generated pages. HOW SEARCH INDEXES GET SYSTEMATICALLY POLLUTED In April 2025, Ahrefs analyzed 900,000 newly published English-language web pages and found that 74.2% contained AI-generated content. Only 25.8% were classified as purely human-written. While 71.7% were categorized as a mix of ‘pure human’ and ‘pure AI’. AI Search Playbook | REDDIT CITATIONS HAVE FALLEN OFF A CLIFF IN CHATGPT Speaking UGC, according to data from Profound, Reddit has dropped from a peak of 12% of citations in all responses to below 1%. In recent weeks it has climbed back up to near 3%. AI Search Playbook | 90% OF ONLINE CONTENT MAY BE AI-GENERATED BY 2026 Digital Ouroboros is on the way with experts estimating that as much as 90% of online content may be AI-generated by 2026. For creators, marketers, and businesses, this raises urgent new questions. How do you compete, rank, or even stay visible in an ecosystem buried under an avalanche of low-quality synthetic content? AI Search Playbook | THE SEO HEIST The 2023 SEO heist story is a classic example. In this case, a co-founder openly bragged about using AI to “steal” 3.6 million visits from a competitor by scraping their sitemap and generating 1,800 articles at scale. The problem? All those articles were published with minimal human oversight, prioritizing pure volume over any semblance of quality or value. AI Search Playbook | HALLUCINATION IS NOT A SOLVED PROBLEM Vectara’s hallucination leaderboard shows that accuracy improvement remains modest: GPT-5 achieves a 1.4% hallucination rate. Gemini’s 2.5 Pro has a 1.1% hallucination rate. AI Search Playbook | THE MISINFORMATION PROBLEM STUDY REVEALED AI SEARCH IS WRONG 60% OF THE TIME A March 2025 study by the Columbia Journalism Review tested eight major AI search engines and found that, for a controlled information retrieval task, chatbots collectively provided inaccurate or misleading answers more than 60% of the time, nearly always without acknowledging uncertainty. CHATGPT HALLUCINATED NEW FEATURES ChatGPT was instructing users to sign up for Soundslice and import ASCII tabs to hear audio playback, but there was just one problem: Soundslice had never supported ASCII tab, meaning the AI had invented the feature out of thin air while setting false expectations for new users and making the company look as if it had misrepresented its own capabilities. SEARCH IS STILL AN UNSOLVED PROBLEM User needs are still very complex and information gaps persist. Search will become increasingly agentic and integrated with other platforms to solve these problems. GOOGLE WANTS TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION YOU HAVE SEARCH WILL CONTINUE TO PROFOUNDLY CHANGE Again, we are not going to revert to 10 blue links as the primary modality of search. We need to be prepared for what’s to come and stop holding to the past. NEW RESEARCH SUGGESTS MOST SEARCH SIGNALS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED This paper discusses a BlockRank method using just the query and documents can perform as well as using Google’s other signals like PageRank and Navboost. Source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.05396 AI Search Playbook | Now is the time to shed all the things that no longer serve us that we inherited in the SEO industry. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | HOW AI SEARCH WORKS WHAT UNDERPINS OUR STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL FOCUS 92 AI SEARCH IS A CHANGE FROM DETERMINISTIC TO PROBABILISTIC RANKINGS Google’s launch of AI Overviews and AI Mode marks a shift from deterministic rankings—where content is surfaced largely as-is based on predefined scoring signals—to probabilistic rankings driven by large language models that interpret, synthesize, and reason across multiple sources. BOTH SEARCH AND GENERATIVE AI ARE BUILT FROM THE VECTOR SPACE MODEL In Search queries and documents are plotted in multidimensional space. Documents physically closer to the query in that space are more relevant. In generative AI, the next word is predicted in that vector space based on the word relationships that have been previously seen. RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED GENERATION (RAG) THE CORE PATTERN BEHIND AI SEARCH At the heart of most AI search platforms is retrieval-augmented generation. RAG addresses the fundamental weaknesses of large language models: hallucinations and knowledge cutoffs. By grounding generation in fresh, externally retrieved data, these systems can deliver answers that are both fluent and factual. I introduced the SEO community to this concept 2 years ago: https://searchengineland.com/how-searc h-generative-experience-works-and-wh y-retrieval-augmented-generation-is-ou r-future-433393 LEXICAL SEARCH IS DRIVEN BY THE DISTRIBUTION OF WORDS THIS IS THE FOUNDATION OF SEARCH The earliest search engines weren’t built to understand meaning. They were built to match strings. In the 1960s and 70s, systems like SMART at Cornell established the core architecture that would dominate Information Retrieval (IR) for the next four decades: the inverted index. If you’ve never seen one in action, picture the index at the back of a reference book. Every term has a list of page numbers where it appears. In IR, those “pages” are documents, and the “page numbers” are actually “postings lists” or ordered references to every document that contains the term. SEMANTIC IS DRIVEN BY A REPRESENTATIONS OF MEANING Instead of treating words as discrete symbols, you could represent them as points in a continuous vector space, where proximity reflected similarity of meaning. The closer two words were in this space, the more likely they were to be used in similar contexts. This leap from symbolic matching to geometric reasoning was the conceptual foundation for embeddings. HYBRID RETRIEVAL POWERS RAG Modern search engines retrieve passages by combining lexical and semantic search then rerank the documents using methods like reciprocal rank fusion (RRF). Keep in mind 95% of SEO tools still only perform lexical analysis. AI Search Playbook | TRANSFORMER GAVE US CONTEXT The breakthrough came in June 2017, when Vaswani et al. published Attention is All You Need. This paper introduced the transformer architecture, which replaced recurrence entirely with a mechanism called self-attention. Instead of processing one token at a time, transformers allowed every token to directly “look at” every other token in the sequence and decide which were most relevant for interpreting its meaning AI Search Playbook | THERE ARE VECTOR REPRESENTATIONS OF EVERYTHING Google’s next leap was to embed everything it cared about in the search ecosystem. The goal wasn’t just to improve retrieval. It was to create a unified semantic framework where any object, a website, an author, an entity, a user profile, could be compared to any other in the same high-dimensional space. ALL CONTENT FORMATS CAN BE EMBEDDED IN THE SAME SPACE Indexing for AI search is often multi-modal. Text passages, images, audio clips, and even tables may be embedded separately, then linked under a shared document ID. This means that an image from your site could be retrieved directly as evidence for a generative answer, even if the text on the page is less competitive. GOOGLE INTRODUCED “PERSONAL CONTEXT” PERSONALIZATION AND MEMORY IN GOOGLE Google is moving beyond one-size-fits-all search results by using AI to personalize responses based on each user’s behavior over time. This is done through user embeddings—AI-generated profiles that represent your interests, preferences, past searches, and even the types of content you engage with. These embeddings allow Google to “remember” patterns and tailor results in real time, shaping which sources are selected and how answers are framed. MUVERA IS MOVING FROM SINGLE VECTORS TO MULTIPLE LAST YEAR GOOGLE RESEARCH UPGRADED THEIR APPROACH Multi-vector models, such as ColBERT, represent each query or document using multiple embeddings, typically one per token. They compute relevance via Chamfer similarity, which measures how each token in the query aligns with its closest token in the document. This method yields more nuanced retrieval decisions, especially for long-form or heterogeneous content, but at tremendous computational cost, especially during large-scale indexing and retrieval. HOW GOOGLE’S AI OVERVIEWS WORK Google’s AI Overviews no longer rely on a single search term to determine what content to show. Instead, they expand the user’s query behind the scenes, pull relevant insights from multiple pages, and generate a synthesized answer.sources. AI Search Playbook | THE AI MODE PROCESS HOW AI MODE WORKS AI Mode extends the AI Overview approach by pulling in more content from more variations of the user’s query—and it doesn’t just stop at text. It evaluates passages, videos, images, and structured data across the web, using large language models to piece together a comprehensive response. AI MODE USES MORE QUERIES AND SOURCES AI Overviews aim for brevity and clarity, so synthesis is constrained. Think of it as a single-shot generation pass with a fixed token budget. AI Mode, by contrast, is conversational and persistent. It can run additional retrieval cycles mid-session, incorporate follow-up questions, and adjust the synthesis style on the fly. HOW THE QUERY FAN-OUT TECHNIQUE WORKS Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode rely on a process called the query fan-out technique, which expands the original search into dozens of related, personalized, and contextual variations—all behind the scenes. This allows Google to pull content from across an entire category, gathering passages from multiple sources to generate a more complete answer. REASONING IS THE GATEKEEPER OF VISIBILITY HOW REASONING WORKS IN GOOGLE LLMS Reasoning is the final stage in Google’s AI response process—where the system decides what to say and how to say it. After gathering content from many sources, Google uses large language models to weigh the relevance of each passage, compare them, and stitch together a cohesive answer. CRAWL-BASED DISCOVERY IT’S “REQUESTING” IN REAL-TIME NOT “CRAWLING” This is the model most content creators are already familiar with, and how traditional search engines like Google and Bing have worked for decades. Crawlers request a page, extract the links, build a queue, and keep doing that until they find the end of the web. LLMs like ChatGPT and Perplexity don’t “crawl,” they request, and they don’t index content or cache the pages so they are requesting in real time API-BASED ACCESS LICENSED OR STRUCTURED FEEDS This model gives AI systems structured, direct access to your content via approved APIs or data partnerships. This is used by ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Copilot integrations. With this model, you retain more control over what data is shared, how it’s presented, and how often it’s updated. However, participation is often limited to companies with licensing deals or API infrastructure, and greater control may come at the cost of reduced organic visibility. THE ANSWER GENERATION PROCESS HERE’S HOW AI SEARCH GENERATES RESPONSES Answer generation is a five step process from when the user submits a query/prompt and system returns a response. That process includes expansion, routing, retrieval, selection, and synthesis. QUERY/PROMPT IS A STARTING POINT IN AI SEARCH In this new retrieval-and-synthesis pipeline, the query you type is not the query the system uses to gather information. Instead, the initial input is treated as a high-level prompt, a clue that sets off a much broader exploration of related questions and possible user needs. The system decomposes the query, rewrites it in multiple forms, generates speculative follow-ups, and routes each variant to different sources. AI Search Playbook | QUERY EXPANSION AND LATENT INTENT MINING The journey from the user’s initial words to the system’s full set of retrieval instructions begins with query expansion. This is the stage where the system broadens the scope of what it is looking for, aiming to cover both the explicit and implicit needs behind the request. AI Search Playbook | INTENT CLASSIFICATION THE QUERY IS BROKEN DOWN INTO NEEDS This classification step informs everything that follows, because it sets constraints on the types of sources and content formats that will be considered. SLOT IDENTIFICATION VARIABLES THAT REPRESENT INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS Slots are variables the system expects to fill in order to produce a useful answer. Some slots are explicit. For example “half marathon” sets the distance, “beginners” sets the audience. Others are implicit. The system may want to know the available training timeframe, the runner’s current fitness level, age group, and goal (finish vs. personal record). These slots may not all be populated immediately, but knowing they exist allows the system to search for content that can fill them. LATENT INTENT PROJECTION THE QUERY IS PLACED IN VECTOR SPACE TO IDENTIFY MORE This is where the original query is embedded into a high-dimensional vector space, and the model identifies neighboring concepts based on proximity. These are not random; they are informed by historical query co-occurrence data, clickstream patterns, and knowledge graph linkages. REWRITES AND DIVERSIFICATIONS The system then generates rewrites and diversifications of the original query. These might include narrowing variations (“12-week half marathon plan for beginners over 40”) or format variations (“printable beginner half marathon schedule”). Each rewrite is designed to maximize the chance of finding a relevant content chunk that might not match the original phrasing. SPECULATIVE SUB-QUESTIONS Finally, the model adds speculative sub-questions. These are based on patterns from similar sessions. Including these in the retrieval plan preemptively allows the system to gather the material it will likely need for synthesis. AI Search Playbook | SUBQUERY ROUTING AND FAN-OUT MAPPING Once the expansion phase has produced a portfolio of sub-queries, the system’s job shifts from what to look for to where to look for it. This is the routing stage, and it is where the fan-out map becomes operational. Each sub-query is now a small task in its own right, and the system must decide which source or sources can best satisfy it, which modality is most appropriate for the answer, and which retrieval strategy will be used to get it. MAPPING SUB-QUERIES TO SOURCES In routing, the system maintains an internal mapping of which source types are most appropriate for different query classes. A “plan” might map to long-form text and structured schedules; a “checklist” might map to listicles and product tables; a “routine” might map to video; a “definition” might map to knowledge bases. AI Search Playbook | RETRIEVAL STRATEGIES AND COST BUDGETING Routing involves both choosing how to retrieve information and managing the cost of retrieval. Retrieval method selection: Some sub-queries work best with sparse retrieval (e.g. BM25) for exact term matches, while others benefit from dense retrieval (embeddings) for semantic similarity. Hybrid approaches combine both to leverage their strengths. Cost-aware budgeting: Each retrieval call uses resources, so systems allocate retrieval effort based on sub-query importance—giving high-priority queries more retrieval passes from multiple sources, and low-priority ones fewer or cheaper calls. This is crucial when using paid APIs or other costly retrieval sources. MATCHING THE ROUTING PROFILE WHERE OPPORTUNITIES ARE WON OR LOST Content must match the expected modality or it won’t be retrieved Ensure multi-modal parity (text, structured data, transcripts, etc.) Place content where the routing logic looks (e.g. API-friendly formats, transcripts for procedural content) Align content with routing profiles to increase retrieval across fan-out branches SELECTION FOR SYNTHESIS Selection is not only about relevance to the sub-query. It is also about the suitability of a chunk to be lifted, recombined, and integrated without introducing factual errors, formatting issues, or incoherence. In effect, the system is ranking not entire pages but atomic units of information, and the scoring criteria are tuned to synthesis needs rather than to click-through behavior. AI Search Playbook | EXTRACTABILITY AS THE FIRST GATE If a chunk cannot be cleanly separated from its surrounding context without losing meaning, it is less valuable to the synthesis process. This is why content that is scoped and labeled clearly tends to survive selection. AI Search Playbook | EVIDENCE DENSITY AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO THE SYSTEM IS LOOKING FOR VERIFIABLE INFORMATION Once extractability is established, the system looks at evidence density or the proportion of meaningful, verifiable information to total tokens. A dense paragraph that gives a clear statement, followed by an immediate citation or supporting data, is more valuable than a lengthy, anecdote-heavy section that buries the facts in storytelling. SCOPE CLARITY AND APPLICABILITY Generative systems are sensitive to scope because they are trying to assemble an answer that is not misleading. If a chunk does not make clear the conditions under which it is true, it is harder to place it correctly in the final answer. AUTHORITY AND CORROBORATION The system also weighs the credibility of the source and the degree to which the information is corroborated by other retrieved chunks. Authority in this context is not limited to domain-level trust; it can apply at the author or publisher level. Corroboration is a subtle but important factor. If three independent, credible sources agree on a specific mileage progression, that progression is more likely to survive selection. Outlier claims may still make it in if they are well-sourced, but the system will often prefer information that has multiple points of agreement. FRESHNESS AND STABILITY Recency is another filter, especially for topics where the facts can change. A chunk that is clearly dated and shows evidence of recent review is more attractive to the model than one with no temporal markers. AI Search Playbook | HARM AND SAFETY FILTERS Finally, selection often applies harm and safety filters. These filters can be domain-specific, drawing on both explicit policies and learned patterns from training data. WHY GOOD CONTENT GETS EXCLUDED High-quality content can be excluded from synthesis if it isn’t easily extractable—interactive designs that aren’t crawlable or long-form narratives that bury key facts risk being skipped in favor of denser, more accessible material. Engineering for the Selection Funnel In practice, this means rethinking how you structure your content. A single long page may need to be designed as a series of clearly marked, self-contained modules, each of which could stand alone if lifted into a generative answer. It also means pairing each chunk with whatever metadata, markup, and alternative formats will make it easier for a retrieval system to recognize and use. AI Search Playbook | STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS AI SEARCH REQUIRES MULTI-DIMENSIONAL APPROACHES Generative search is not a single ranking contest for a single query. It is a multi-stage filtering process in which your content competes at dozens of points in a branching, multimodal retrieval plan. The fan-out means the system is looking for breadth as well as depth, and the synthesis step means it is judging your content on extractability and readiness, not just relevance. IT’S JUST SEO, RIGHT? NOPE. 133 My data-driven beliefs don’t require you to agree with me. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | AI Search uses retrieval so SEO matters even more than ever. — You, SEO Person,Some Company AI Search Manual | That’s true, but presupposes that the SEO community has broadly kept up with advancements in retrieval. The best practices, software, and common understanding suggests otherwise. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | ZIPTIE’S DATA SAYS BEING IN THE TOP 10 GIVES YOU A 25% CHANCE OF APPEARING IN AI SEARCH Nobody can run a business on a 25% chance. Clearly there must be something better. PROFOUND’S DATA SAYS IT’S A 19% CHANCE OF APPEARING IN AI SEARCH So, if ranking in Organic Search doesn’t guarantee performance in AI Search, how is it JUST SEO?! 28.3% OF CHATGPT-CITED PAGES DON’T RANK FOR ANYTHING IN ORGANIC SEARCH! https://ahrefs.com/blog/chatgpts -most-cited-pages/ AI Search Playbook | Show me what you do for GEO that you don’t do for SEO. — You, SEO Person,Some Company AI Search Manual | It’s deeply disappointing to hear that the SEO community still struggles with the distinction between strategy and tactics. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | There Are Several Different Disciplines That USE THE EXACT SAME TACTICS Social Media Marketing Is Just Channel-Specific Content Strategy Yet, it’s its Own Category There is no difference between what you do in Content Strategy and Social Media Marketing. However, the channel specificity is big enough that it warrants its own category. Doing Things for AI Search Can Also Make Rankings Drop EACH CHANNEL IS DIFFERENT You need a bespoke strategy for all channels. The optimizations that may work for ChatGPT may cause AIOs to decline. Your chunking strategy for Google’s AI surfaces may yield lower performance in classic search. CHATGPT USES BING AND GOOGLE AS ITS INDICES URLS ARE REQUESTED IN REAL TIME THOUGH Base ChatGPT models do not maintain their own web index. They are trained on a massive static corpus, but pull URLs from indices and request them in real-time. ChatGPT generates search queries, sending them to Bing’s API (although new evidence indicates that they also pull from Google using SERP API), and retrieves a short list of URLs. It then fetches the full content of selected URLs at runtime and processes them directly for synthesis. Specific On-Page Factors are MORE MEANINGFUL TO CHATGPT Forums with Pages with actual extractable data, that answer the relevant numbers, and question discussions comparisons Meta Descriptions Semantic URLs Recent publish dates Source: Profound BING COPILOT USES ITS INDEX WITH CHATGPT THE SYSTEM CAN TAKE ACTION IN THE MS365 ECOSYSTEM CoPilot inherits Microsoft’s full-fledged Bing ranking infrastructure and then layers GPT-class synthesis on top. The consequence is a pipeline where traditional SEO signals still matter a lot because they determine which candidates ever make it to the grounding set, while extractability and clarity determine whether those candidates become citations in the final conversational response. PERPLEXITY USES BING AND GOOGLE AND PUTS CITATIONS IN THE FOREGROUND Perplexity foregrounds its citations. Sources are displayed prominently, often before the generated answer itself, allowing observers to see precisely which pages informed its synthesis. This transparency makes it not only a powerful answer engine for users, but also an unusually open laboratory for GEO practitioners seeking to understand what content earns visibility. THERE ARE DIFFERENT STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS For example, you like me, may not want to have pricing on your site. For SEO that’s fine, but for generative AI that means you lose control over your brand narrative. I did not do any of that fancy “GEO” stuff and I’m in ChatGPT in 24 hours. — You, SEO Person,Some Company AI Search Manual | Cool. Now show me that in a competitive prompt/query space. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | Chunking is a scam. — You, SEO Person, Some Company AI Search Manual | HERE’S AN ORIGINAL PARAGRAPH TARGETING [MACHINE LEARNING] AND [DATA PRIVACY] The development of sophisticated algorithms capable of learning from vast datasets has revolutionized numerous industries, enabling predictive models that can identify patterns and make decisions with minimal human intervention; this process of training models on historical information is the core of modern artificial intelligence. However, the collection and use of this data, especially personal information, raise significant concerns about individual rights and the potential for misuse, leading to the establishment of regulations like GDPR and CCPA. These legal frameworks mandate that organizations implement robust security measures, such as encryption and anonymization, to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. The challenge lies in balancing the insatiable need for high-quality training data, which improves model accuracy and performance, with the ethical obligation to ensure that an individual's personal details are not compromised, requiring techniques that can safeguard information while still allowing for valuable analytical insights to be drawn. COSINE SIMILARITY MACHINE LEARNING - 0.6481 DATA PRIVACY - 0.6948 NOW I JUST SPLIT IT INTO TWO PARAGRAPHS TARGETING [MACHINE LEARNING] AND [DATA PRIVACY] MACHINE LEARNING - 0.7477 15.4% COSSIM IMPROVEMENT DATA PRIVACY - 0.7634 9.78% COSSIM IMPROVEMENT Chunking can improve your relevance. Anyone telling you otherwise does not know what they are talking about. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | You don’t have any case studies that prove this works. — You, SEO Person, Some Company AI Search Manual | Sure I do. What you’re telling me is that you don’t though. — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Manual | 2X GROWTH IN AI SEARCH VISIBILITY FOR A VEHICLE SALES PLATFORM Itʼs still early days, but weʼre seeing great results for our clients on AI Search platforms. 661% Growth in ChatGPT, 330% Growth in AI Overviews Our client in the automotive industry has experienced substantial growth across all major generative AI search surfaces, including Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. This growth has been driven by a combination of technical improvements and strategic content enhancements. Notably, theyʼve achieved significant visibility gains on non-branded queries that previously eluded them. These Are the Result of Relevance Engineering Efforts To drive these results, the client prioritized enhancements to their JavaScript rendering to ensure full crawlability and indexation. They also expanded their content footprint with new, high-intent pages and leveraged detailed competitive analyses to identify and close semantic gaps. These efforts were supported by a structured content engineering process that aligned page copy with user intent and topical authority. PAGE 158 HOW A CATEGORY LEADING TELECOMMUNICATIONS BRAND ACHIEVED 253% GROWTH IN AI OVERVIEWS VISIBILITY The Results o 1.41 million impressions in AI Overviews o AI Overview inclusions grew from 712 to 3,235 in one year o Steady month-over-month growth in AI-driven visibility The Background A major telecommunications provider wanted to expand its footprint in AI Search. Traditional SEO had secured rankings in organic results, but their visibility in AI Overviews was lagging, especially for competitive, branded queries where consumers increasingly rely on generative answers. The brand recognized the need for a strategy tailored to the mechanics of AI search. What We Did We applied a content engineering optimization framework, including: ● ● ● Restructuring content with semantic clarity and answer-like formatting to make it extractable for AI Overviews. Enhancing technical accessibility with clean HTML hierarchy, sitemaps, and schema markup to support generative retrieval. Creating entity-rich, data-backed passages aligned with how AI models build summaries. This combination of technical SEO and AI-native content structuring enabled the clientʼs pages to be consistently selected for AI Overviews, compounding visibility over time. GENERATIVE AI CASE STUDY Our Goals o Expand visibility in AI Overviews for branded and competitive queries o Increase generative search presence and organic impressions o Position telecom content as authoritative, extractable, and AI-ready Services Used o Competitive Analysis o Content Engineering o Content Audit o Content Plan PAGE 159 Until the software catches up, it’s not realistic to expect everyone is doing the form of idealistic SEO that would make AI Search “just SEO.” — Me, CEO, iPullRank AI Search Playbook | WHAT TO DO TIME TO DO SOME RELEVANCE ENGINEERING 161 OUR STRATEGIC APPROACH FOR DRIVING VISIBILITY IN AI SEARCH TACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION 5 STEPS TO UNDERSTANDING THE GAPS IN CONTENT Relevance Engineering is the process of adjusting content so it’s selected and cited by Google’s AI systems like AI Overviews and AI Mode. Unlike traditional SEO, which focuses on ranking full pages, this approach targets the individual passages and concepts that AI uses to construct responses EXPAND KEYWORDS WITH QFORIA THIS HELPS YOU UNDERSTAND YOUR CONTENT GAPS Qforia extrapolates synthetic queries based on the initial prompt and gives you their type and reasoning similar to what Google is doing. https://ipullrank.com/tools/qforia 164 QFORIA HAS BEEN QUIETLY UPDATED IT DETERMINES THE EXPECTED TYPES OF CONTENT PER TERM The concept of routing content is now used as part of the pipeline so it tells you the type of content Gemini would consider the best match for that subquery. 165 QFORIA DATA NOT “REAL ENOUGH” FOR YOU? REVERSE INTERSECT THE CITATIONS Pull the AIO citation URLs and find out what they rank for using the Semrush API. Then intersect those terms to figure out what the “real” fan-out queries are. We use FetchSERP as the SERP API for this. 166 OMNIMEDIA CONTENT STRATEGIES It requires us to think beyond text and align with the expected content formats and locations to drive visibility. TACTICS THAT WILL RETURN Cloaking/Double-serving Brands will serve content as markdown or add additional content to their pages for the LLMs to consume. Tools like Scrunch AI have already begun to offer this as a service. Persona-driven Content Brands will develop persona-driven content to align with the hyper-personalized user contexts. Internal Knowledge Graphs Brands will develop their own knowledge graphs to scale content production across multiple surfaces. Application Integrations Microsites Brands will resurrect non-branded microsites so can generates consensus of information across the web. Organizations will build applications and data pipelines directly into these surfaces in partnership with the Google and OpenAI. The platforms will default to these unless there is a clear semantic gap. Content Partnerships Brands will engage in content syndication and development of branded content on other platforms to curate information consensus. 168 DOUBLE SERVE AT THE EDGE WITH CLOUDFLARE Cloudflare Workers has a Markdown Conversion feature at the edge that allows you to double serve markdown to genAI bots. AI Search Playbook | MEASUREMENT MUST EVOLVE BEYOND PERFORMANCE METRICS THREE BUCKETS FOR MEASUREMENT Signals that show whether your content and site are aligned with how AI and search engines understand and retrieve information. Passage Relevance Entity Salience Bot Activity Synthetic Query Rankings Measures how visible, cited, and represented your brand is across search and AI surfaces. Share of Voice Citation Rate Citation Quality Citation Sentiment Outcomes that prove whether visibility and citations translate into business impact. Traffic Events Conversions Engagement Depth TRACK BRANDED IMPRESSIONS FOR NON-BRANDED TERMS If your brand appears for non-branded terms that is a brand awareness impression. Extract your brand terms from the AIO response in your SERP analytics tool and combine the impression metrics from GSC. NEW DASHBOARDS We’ve developed a series of dashboards that highlight the AI Search metrics so we have clarity on the levers that need to be pulled. AI Search Playbook | CONTENT PERFORMANCE TRACKING Monitors passage-level relevance across multiple AI platforms. Unlike traditional SEO metrics, this requires tracking new performance indicators. Duane Forrester suggests a “new dashboard” for the GenAI era, featuring metrics such as Chunk Retrieval Frequency, Embedding Relevance Score, and AI Citation Count. AI Search Playbook | UGC For queries involving troubleshooting, product comparisons, lived experiences, or niche use cases, user-generated content (UGC) and forum discussions are often prioritized by AI systems. Generative models value this type of content because it reflects authentic, diverse, and situational insights that can’t always be found in more polished corporate content. ENTITY-RICH, EMBEDDING-FRIENDL Y LANGUAGE Write with clearly defined entities Use consistent terminology Include modifiers and descriptors: Qualifiers like size, function, location, and purpose help differentiate similar entities. AI Search Playbook | STRUCTURED DATA I’m not here to argue with you how and when it’s used. Just know that LLMs can and do use structured data as part of RAG pipelines. ON-PAGE ELEMENTS CHECKLIST SEO BASICS ❏ ❏ ❏ ❏ Heading hierarchy Clean, semantic content Open Robots.txt Topical Clustering Yes, a lot of the SEO basic best practices apply here. 177 WRITING FOR SYNTHESIS To ensure your content performs well in modern retrieval systems, it’s essential to structure it in a way that is both machine-readable and human-friendly. Embedding models rely on clean, well-defined “chunks” or semantic units of information to generate precise and relevant results. AI Search Playbook | RELEVANCE SCORE PASSAGES USE RELEVANCE DOCTOR We built a simple tool that scores passages of content in a layout aware format. This will improve your ability to be considered and extracted. https://ipullrank.com/tools/relevance-doctor 179 PASSAGE OPTIMIZATION Optimizing for extractability means that content should be organized into easily defined sections. Headings and subheadings should be clear, and passages should answer queries directly and succinctly. The combination of query/passage is defined as a semantic unit, and these units are used to power AI search. AI Search Playbook | Semantic Triples Semantic triples help search engines understand context better by identifying entities, establishing connections, and building a web of interconnected concepts, which provide richer contextual information beyond just keywords. These Subject–Predicate–Object triples are the building blocks of knowledge graphs, which allow AI systems to understand relationships between entities, enabling more intelligent search results, factual verification, and structured data for AI overviews. USE SEMANTIC TRIPLES Semantic triples (subject-predicate-object) significantly boost retrieval accuracy and content relevance. To do this, always use the active voice. PROVIDE UNIQUE, HIGHLY SPECIFIC, OR EXCLUSIVE INSIGHTS Unique content or proprietary data increases the likelihood that your page is retrieved and cited as authoritative in RAG pipelines. AVOID AMBIGUITY Clearly defined, straightforward sentences reduce embedding noise and retrieval errors. SIMULATE YOUR RANKINGS BASED ON CHANGES TOOLS LIKE MARKETBREW ALSO HELP YOU DO THIS We have an AI Overview simulator that runs a RAG pipeline and takes updated content to see what would be returned. It also makes recommendations on what to do in order to improve the retrievability. With so much being open source, there is no reason that all SEO software companies cannot offer something similar. MarketBrew is a company that focuses on this idea across SEO generally. TOOLS FOR THE FUTURE HERE ARE SOME TOOLS I RECOMMEND CHECKING OUT 186 N8N IS A MUST HAVE TO CLOSE THE GAPS IN THE SEO TOOLS SPACE We have an AI Overview simulator that runs a RAG pipeline and takes updated content to see what would be returned. It also makes recommendations on what to do in order to improve the retrievability. With so much being open source, there is no reason that all SEO software companies cannot offer something similar. MarketBrew is a company that focuses on this idea across SEO generally. I prefer open source options so I can customize them to my needs and I don’t have to worry about data privacy. — Me, CEO, iPullRank No Code, All Flow | OLLAMA It’s an open source platform and API for running open source models. I use it for pretty much everything y’all use the closed models for unless I need fidelity with Google. https://ollama.com No Code, All Flow | Much of what you can do in major chatbots, but Open Source Ollama Has a Chat Interface It features a web search mode to perform RAG and give you similar responses to the major chatbots. If you don’t have the model you select, it will go get it for you It Downloads Models Automatically It features a web search mode as well. Model size matters too, but you can do most with mid-sized models It’s Fast If You Have a Decent GPU It features a web search mode as well. Generative features in crawl data for free Screaming Frog + Ollama I generate embeddings and qualitatively assess content, and as I crawl all on my own GPU I RUN N8N OPEN SOURCE TOO It’s really easy to get up and running with n8n locally or on your own hosted environment. Just install NodeJS and run npx n8n. npx n8n n8n start No Code, All Flow | N8N HAS 1121 INTEGRATIONS I generate embeddings as I crawl, asset content, take screenshots and analyze as I crawl. All on my own local GPU. Use n8n to operate a backend You Can Build a Full Microservice You can have the n8n act as an API that you can easily integrate with Google Workspace or any other application. FLEXIBLE HUMAN IN THE LOOP IS ONE OF N8N’S BEST FEATURES You can set up workflows to ping you in a variety of places and only move forward based on that. USE THE TEMPLATES LOCALLY The templates available at https://n8n.io/workflows are imported into my local instance from a single click. Use them as a place to start with building your own workflows. https://n8n.io/workflows/4822-extract-and-analyze-google-ai-overviews-with-llm-for-seo-recommendations/ Automated AIO Analysis This extracts AIO details and generates recommendations on how to improve your content to appear in AIOs. AI WORKFLOW BUILDER FEATURE MAKES IT EASY N8N has a chat-driven workflow builder feature that allows you to describe the workflow you want and it configures it end to end. AI Search Playbook IF YOU’RE CONSIDERING AGENTS CHECK OUT CREW.AI AND BUILD FULLY FUNCTIONAL AGENTS FROM CHAT Crew is available as a cloud-based application or open source. You can code your agents from scratch or describe what you want in the chat interface and quickly develop a series of agents to help you scale you work. https://www.crewai.com WRAPPING UP CLOSING ARGUMENTS 202 If You Don’t Remember Anything Else… REMEMBER THESE FIVE THINGS Search technology and behavior has changed irrevocably. It will take more than SEO to get you visibility in the future Learn how the systems work so you can discover new opportunities Most of your This is an SEO tools will opportunity to not help you define the future. get where you need to go. 204 SCREAMING FROG + OLLAMA I generate embeddings as I crawl, asset content, take screenshots and analyze as I crawl. All on my own local GPU. 20 CHAPTERS OF PURE 🔥🔥🔥 Everything you need to know about how AI Search works. No vagueries. ipullrank.com/ai-search-manual AI Search Playbook | WE’RE DOING IT EVEN BIGGER NEXT YEAR HTTPS://SEOWEEK.ORG https://ipullrank.com 6 THANK YOU | Q&A Mike King Founder / CEO @iPullRank [email protected] Tap in with us: ipullrank.com iPullRank has been proudly featured in: Award Winning, #GirlDad
本文档为站内渲染。原始文件本地路径:saas/source/seo-llm/raw-seo知识库-TXT整理-PPT-John喜欢和引用的那些海外演讲嘉宾PPTs-FoundConf-Mike-K-8fc20f.txt(仅本地保留,不入库不部署)